Cast Iron Inspection Platform, Grade 2, T-Slot Opening

Cast Iron Inspection Platform Selection Guide: The Core of Motor Test Platforms
As crucial infrastructure in laboratories, factories, and other settings, the selection of cast iron inspection platforms directly impacts workplace safety, durability, and operational efficiency. With a wide variety of iron floor products available on the market, making a scientifically informed choice has become a challenge for many users. This article will outline key considerations for selecting cast iron inspection platforms from dimensions such as material properties, structural design, and installation maintenance, helping users make informed decisions.
I. Core Material: The Foundation Determining Floor Lifespan and Performance

The core material of a cast iron inspection platform directly affects its load-bearing capacity, corrosion resistance, and service life. Currently, mainstream products utilize the following three types of steel:
1. Cold-rolled steel plate: Features a smooth and flat surface, typically with a thickness between 1.2–3mm, offering high mechanical strength and deformation resistance. Suitable for locations requiring frequent movement of heavy equipment, but attention must be paid to its anti-rust treatment process; it is advisable to choose products that have undergone galvanization.
2. Hot-rolled steel plate: Has a broader thickness range (3–6mm) and relatively lower cost, but with a higher surface roughness. Ideal for industrial environments where aesthetics are less critical but high load-bearing capacity is needed. During selection, check for burrs or other safety issues along the edges.
3. Stainless steel plate: Types 304 or 316L stainless steel offer resistance to acid and alkali corrosion, making them particularly suitable for special environments like chemical laboratories and clean rooms. It is essential to verify authenticity; genuine products should provide material test reports and exhibit no obvious color differences or scratches on the surface.
Recommendation: Use a magnetic test for preliminary material judgment—ordinary carbon steel has strong magnetism, while stainless steel has weak magnetism. For high-precision laboratories, opt for special steel with demagnetization treatment.
II. Structural Design of Cast Iron Inspection Platforms: Balancing Science and Ergonomics
1. Support: Iron floors employ I-beam or grid beam support structures, with load-bearing capacities reaching 5–10t/m². During inspection, ensure welding points are uniform and robust. Products using laser cutting technology can control precision errors within ±0.5mm.
2. Anti-slip treatment: Common anti-slip patterns include diamond, dot, and stripe designs. For laboratory environments, choose three-dimensional patterns with a depth ≥1.5mm, requiring an anti-slip coefficient of R10 or higher. Some settings may consider laying anti-slip mats or using perforated steel plates.
3. Edge treatment: Chamfer design should be ≥45°, and edge polishing must meet the industrial standard of Ra ≤3.2μm. For locations requiring cable laying, opt for modular designs with wireway channels.
Case comparison: A laboratory once experienced equipment sliding accidents due to the use of ordinary flat iron floors. After switching to anti-slip floors with honeycomb sandwich structures, not only were safety issues resolved, but concealed bottom wiring was also achieved.
By applying the above selection methods for cast iron inspection platforms, users can establish a comprehensive evaluation framework to avoid common procurement pitfalls. The final product chosen should be a solution that, within budget constraints, maximally meets specific usage needs while allowing appropriate room for upgrades. During actual procurement, it is recommended to create a detailed comparison scoring sheet for quantitative assessment of each indicator and conduct acceptance tests when necessary.
Weiyue Machinery, Ms. Xie 15350773479